Tag Archives: Egalitarianism

Perceived Exaltation 

If you frequent social media then you may have seen how some people interact with celebrities. People in the entertainment industry who are famous and popular in the mainstream media. Both male and female celebrities have a wide range of fans: from the causal “Love your work.” types, to the overzealous “Oh my god, you’re my idol!” types. Both can be quite respectable in their interactions and both can make a celebrity’s experience on social media a pleasant and exciting one.

But there is also another spectrum of fandom in society. This one includes fans who’s opinions are more based in their core of heart, be-it admiration or spite. These particular fans, whichever end of the spectrum they’re on, they are either positive or negative purely. From the unconditionally adoring “You’ve inspired me, I’m with you no matter what.” types, to the spitefully aspersing “You suck, and I hope you die.” types.

Both can be quite revealing in their extremes and both can come-off as unexpectedly perturbing, to a degree. But I would say that both are somewhat necessary as the prior example (the adoring type) is the type to stick by you no matter what, and the latter (the disparaging type) keep you cautious and vigilant.

As fans (and admirers) some of us tend to forget that these are still flawed human beings. They have dreams, aspirations, fears, obsessions, habits, beliefs, convictions, phobias (probably not Public Speaking though), and desires. They are educated on somethings, they are uneducated on somethings, they have perspectives and opinions, they make mistakes and sometimes bad choices, they have responsibilities and concerns. They are not perfect (well, one of them is, to me) but their popularity does not make them any-less merited of respect.

Some people get lost in the fantasy of watching this profession, and forget that the individual portraying a character is still a living being and is to be respected as such.

Logic vs. Impetuousity 

Today is January 22nd 2016. Fourth three years ago the ‘Roe vs. Wade’ decision was made, and today many men, and women of different races, ages, and political affiliations consider themselves to be “Pro Choice” and will rationalize their position on Aborting Pregnancies.

Many citing Sexual Abuse as a logical reason for aborting a pregnancy, the fallacy with this logic is that the number of women who abort pregnancies that are the result of assault (incest is included as it is still assault) are less than the number of the abortions chosen for inconvenience. Statistics show that the majority of aborted pregnancies are made for inconveniences to the mother.

I have a small home, and I invite eight guests to dinner but knowing that I only have food for one person. My guests show up and I have only one plate of food, and only on chair to a small table. Why would I invite guests to dinner knowing that I haven’t enough room, or food to accommodate them?

They ask me this, and my response is that it’s my home and I can invite whomever I want, whenever I want, and that I’m not a soup kitchen and I don’t have to feed them.

Calling their cell phones while their on the road, to tell them “never mind” would not be as sensible as not having invited them in the first place.

“Well they weren’t actual Guests yet because they hadn’t arrived”

“Well how did I know they were going to accept the invitation?”

“Well this is my home and my courtesy so I have the right to ask people over, regardless of my level of preparedness for their acceptance of the invitation.”

When a man and a woman cooperately create a pregnancy, and the man refuses to support the woman after delivery he is forced to support the child monetarily. He is also disparaged by the public and ostracized as a Deadbeat Dad. The judicial system does not consider hi. to have the Right of Choice in this matter.
This is an example of inequality of Reroductive Rights for Men in this country.

Men are expected to take on their responsibilities as co-conspirators to the pregnancy. Women are not socialy held to these same standards and are advocated to have the choice of deflecting that responsibility. This as an example of Female Privilege to Choice.

Willful Naivety

I don’t understand how some Women and some Men can still proclaim to be Feminist in light of such factuality and legitimate refutation of their narratives.

I just saw a video on YuTube of an intelligent woman who just laid out some pure factuality about the misinformation of Feminism (claiming it’s about Equality when it literally isn’t)

To be naive is one thing, but for so many feminists to willfully disregard the factuality that is presented in this video, is shameful.

The lady (a truly independent woman) in the video was dynamic, and accurate on her refutation of Feminism. This is why we have women who are against feminism and, as well as Male Anti-Feminists

It’s because there are still intelligent women, and men who opt for evidential factuality over emotional assertion. This is why I’m an Egalitarian.

I don’t why some women still claim Feminism, in spite of its inaccuracy. Why do some people prefer emotion over evidence?

The Wealth of Wisdom

I’ve been called Racist by White folks.

I’ve been called “Coon” by Black folks.

I’ve been called “Nigger” by White folks.

I’ve even been called “Nigga” by Black folks.

I’ve even been called a “cracker-lover” although I won’t disagree, I love TownHouse😋

I’m assuming that I have been called these things (long before Facebook) because I refuse to patronize Blacks, and I refuse to condemn Whites. I don’t pretend all White people have a history of innocence, and I don’t presume all Whites are inherent “Devils” as some people so disgustingly put it.

I am thirty two years of age (plus nine months & thousands of years in-spirit) and I have been blessed with enough discernment & wisdom to know that “Devils” come in all ages, genders, and “colors”.

This is why some feminists call me Misogynist: because I recognize the basic social privileges women have, and I push for egalitarianism to avoid disregarding the greatly-significant yet often-disregarded issues that men face judicially and socially.
Like higher suicide rates, higher murder rates, lesser empathized-with, quicker to be assumed guilty when accused, etc.

I wonder why is it that people always want to pretend that Race doesn’t exist? You mean to tell me that you can’t recognize and respect the diverse Races in this world? You dont have to be colorblind to equally respect the various colors.

So you’ve either got to be bigoted, or just pretend they don’t exist? Those are your only two options? How about this: There are different Races of people in this country, some have differences, but you respect them all equally.

No one is inferior, or superior based on their Race.

No one is intelligent, or ignorant, based on their Race.

No one is presumed to be a “thug”, based on their Race.

And no one is automatically assumed to be Racist, based on their Race.

Race does exist, we should not pretend that it doesn’t. We should just respect each race equally and stop making presumption about a person based on their skin color or ethnicity. Our source (or spirit) is from the same Creator.

Thank you for reading, this has been a blog from a part Native American, part Black, part Puerto Rican, Indigo Child (adult)

Misogyny: A Equally Offensive Issue

The main misconception of misogyny is that it can only be propagated or committed by Males. This is false, many females express hatred toward other Women and they actually take steps toward sabotaging the lives & well-being of other Women.

In many different aspects of society you can find instances where women attempt to belittle, demean, and deceive other women. For many different reasons: revenge, jealousy, spite, etc. Even violence, I’ve seen more Viral Videos of women assaulting other women, than I have seen Men assaulting women.

Since Females express hatred towards each other, does that make them Misogynists? Or is hatred only valid when it comes from the opposite Sex?

Feminism is not equality, it is gender-specific a focus on Femininity. That’s why most feminists will argue with you if you were to mention Masculine issues during a conversation.

They call you a “Detractor” and say that you are “detracting attention from feminine issues” as if the word “equality” means ‘Only one gender may be the focus’
This is hypocrisy in its purest form.

Egalitarianism is the true focus on equality for both Male & Female.

Gender-Based Privilege

I recently read a statement from a Male Comedian who spoke of Female Comediennes as being the sole recipients of “Sexual Threats” during their respective performances. This appeared to be another exclusive-narrative where “Women are victims & Men don’t know what it feels like”

I wouldn’t doubt that there’ve been some Female Comedians to receive crude, absurd, & crass remarks or “heckles” from specific attention-seeking Male audience members. There are however, many instances of Women speaking absurd, crass, disparaging remarks toward Men can be found frequently throughout Social Media. Which is a much more common occurrence than Comedy venues.

Gender-bias empathy is another common occurrence in Society in general. For example: if a Woman cries (for any reason) people rush to console her, and will confront anyone whom they believe to be responsible for causing her tears.
Yet, if a Man cries (for any reason other than losing a child) he is discouraged from expressing emotion, and is often told to “man-up”. Which implies that Males aren’t allowed to express emotion.

If a Male is accused of Pedophilia, he is presumed guilty by the majority and is often threatened with sexual assault. Yet, if a Woman actually has a sexual acquaintance with one of her Students, no one threatens her with such cruelty. And you rarely find comments wishing harm toward her, on Social Media.
In society, Women have many social privileges. Most of the privileges that are assumed to be awarded to Males are actually Institutional.

Females are often given many advantages, often in the form of sympathy, and empathy.
For example: a young Woman claims to have been assaulted (be it sexual, or non-sexually) is believed immediately by the majority of those made aware. And even if her claims turn out to be false, there are still some who would excuse her. However, if a Male accuses a Female of assault (any) he will have to fight in order to prove his claim.

Another majorly significant privilege that Females have socially, is the freedom of choice in Child Bearing. If a Woman conceives a child with a Man, she may opt-out of that responsibility of raising, or even birthing that child.
And she will be exalted as “exercising her rights”, whereas if a Man where to choose the denial of his responsibilities to that child he would be shunned by others (including the mother) as a “deadbeat dad” or even a “coward”

So the implication is that Women may freely (without Gov intervention) choose rather or not they wish to assume parental responsibility, but Men are obligated (legally) to assume responsibility. This is an example of a Social, Judicial, & Parental privilege for Women.